i recently watched this documentary and, as cute as the babies were, i couldn't help but think about my introduction to psychology class when we were discussing the nature vs. nurture argument. this argument is one of the top three most important debates or questions in human development. this issue has been in existence since the very beginning of psychology, and dates back to the times of the ancient greeks, such as plato and aristotle. in fact, these two very well-known philosophers disagreed when it came to this argument. the issue has remained just that over the years but has been updated over time to fit the modern paradigms and beliefs. according to the modern nature position, human behavior and development are governed by the automatic, genetically predetermined process known as maturation. under this position, it is believed that there is a critical period within which we are particularly sensitive to certain experiences that shape the capacity for future development. on the other side of the debate, is the nurturist position, which includes those who believe that development occurs by learning through personal experience and observation of others.
keeping that in mind, although i'm not sure the exact purpose for creating this documentary but it seems to me that one of the major reasons was to show how there are a lot of common characteristics among babies, even universally. for a year, the documentary followed four different babies. the babies were from all over the world. with one from mongolia, namibia, san franscisco, and tokyo. regardless of their location in the world, the babies all acted the same. to me, this only solidified the nature position. i just don't see how it couldn't be true if there is more cross-cultural proof like this.,and i am positive there is. i agree that you learn things when you are older and able to understand, but it can't be denied that in the beginning it is mostly genetics.